Urban Growth and Water Sanitation in African Cities
Consider Kariakoo, the bustling heart of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Here, The water supply and drainage system consists of old pipes dating back to colonial times. Over the past decades, population growth has resulted in an unstable infrastructure that cannot meet the increasing demand for water supply and drainage. Problems such as insufficient pipe capacity, overloaded sewerage systems, and accumulation of rainwater in drains all point to a huge gap between water demand and population growth. There is, therefore, a need for the Government to work towards improving sanitation along with urbanisation.
Picture of Storm water drainage system in Kariakoo
Recognising these issues, African governments have introduced various urban policies to enhance urban sanitation (Jenkins et al., 2014). These include increasing investment in infrastructure construction and improving urban water supply, drainage systems, and waste disposal facilities. Although the implementation of the policy has achieved certain goals, some factors still hinder the improvement of sanitation conditions. For example, insufficient funding has made it difficult for urban infrastructure development to keep pace with urbanisation. In some cities, poor urban planning and management have led to disorder in the urban environment, further affecting the improvement of sanitation conditions (Hyman et al., 2017). For instance, in Kroo Bay, Sierra Leone, the surge of informal settlements housing over half the urban population is a testament to these challenges, where basic amenities like health centres, piped water, and safe sanitation remain a distant dream for many.
Picture of Kroo Bay informal settlements, Sierra Leone.
There is a strong need for urban development strategies, particularly for the distribution of water and sanitation facilities. One possible solution is to have different systems for different types of settlements, taking into account several factors, such as the distance between mains, the possible extent of development in the urban area, the topography and the distance from streams and rivers. The uniqueness of the site must also be taken into account in order to implement better solutions in terms of future development. (Pastore., 2015).


Hi Nia,
ReplyDeleteI really like that you are focusing on urban areas here, since as you mentioned rapid urbanisation is creating pressure on WASH conditions. Do you think that a bottom-up approach will be a good complementary to improve the WASH conditions in the urban area, given certain degree of failures with a top-down approach? Looking forward to your insights!
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThank you for your comment! You reminded me that my blog looks at WASH from a top-down perspective and I've focused more on the government's perspective. Through Professor Ben Page's lecture, we also learned about the case of Cameroon, where the community spontaneously formed an organisation to get water supply and repair facilities when the institutional management failed. This could also relate to Simone's idea of people as a social infrastructure.
DeleteHi Nia,
ReplyDeleteFascinating point about the colonial legacy in urban sanitation. How do you think this history continues to impact current policies and infrastructure development in African cities?
Thank you for your question. I think the impact is seen mainly in the inequality of infrastructure, where the different classes have different accessibility to water. Also, policy and planning frameworks may continue the way they were in colonial times. The history of colonisation may also have made the country's development overly dependent on the support of other countries, making it difficult for self-development.
DeleteThis blog makes to realize the ultimate link between urban development and the distribution of water and sanitation facilities. Very critical aspect when examining sanitation problems within both rural and urban contexts of Africa. The installation and repair of pipes and sewage systems are very much government and officials' responsibilities while the pit latrine strategy mentioned in your previous blog are very likely local knowledges and adaptation to sanitation. I see you are opening up the sanitation horizon from local to broader scale, really appreciate reading this!
ReplyDeleteI am wondering, if there is very little infrastructural development among these broken public infrastructures, what are the solutions to mitigate these issues?